kigrommet

A Hong Kong court has banned people from publishing a wide range of personal details about police officers and their families, including photos, in a bid to halt "doxxing" by pro-democracy protesters.The Hong Kong Journalists Association said it was "extremely concerned" about the potential limitations to media freedoms and said it was seeking legal advice.

The current wording leaves no exceptions, including for media, making it unclear how it will be applied and whether it will restrict work by reporters. The police force says many of its officers have had personal details leaked online -- known as "doxxing" -- and family members harassed as a result.The semi-autonomous Chinese city has been battered by nearly five months of seething pro-democracy rallies in which police and protesters have fought increasingly violent battles. The injunction also bans "intimidating, molesting, harassing, threatening, pestering or interfering" with any police officer or family member.

Hardline protesters have thrown Molotov cocktails and bricks at police, as well as vandalised businesses perceived as being pro-China..Lawyers for the force went to Hong Kong&China Rubber gasket39;s High Court on Friday asking for an injunction forbidding people from publishing a slew of personal information including key details such as names, addresses, dates of birth and identity card numbers.Earlier this month an officer was stabbed in the neck.The temporary injunction, uploaded on government websites overnight, was criticised by some on Saturday for its broad wording and for further shielding the identity of officers as they clash with protesters. Pro-Beijing lawmakers defended the injunction.The court granted the injunction for 14 days pending a longer legal hearing. Hong Kong's police have already faced criticism for hiding their identities during clashes by removing warrant card numbers from their uniforms, as well as using face masks and shining bright torches at reporters.

Anthony Daparin, a lawyer who has written a book about the city's protest movement, described the ban as a "very alarming development". A Hong Kong court has banned people from publishing a wide range of personal details about police officers and their families, including photos, in a bid to halt "doxxing" by pro-democracy protesters.Police counter that they are facing unprecedented levels of public anger and abuse and need to protect their staff from retribution and harassment.Earlier this month the city's pro-Beijing leader Carrie Lam used a colonial-era emergency law to ban protesters from wearing face masks. But they also sought a ban on publishing details about a police officer's Facebook and Instagram IDs, their car number plates and any photograph of an officer or their family without consent. Hong Kong court bans publishing police details, including photos AFP Published: Oct 26, 2019, 11:56 am IST Updated: Oct 26, 2019, 11:56 am IST Earlier this month the city's pro-Beijing leader Carrie Lam used a colonial-era emergency law to ban protesters from wearing face masks. Police have responded with increasing amounts of rubber bullets, tear gas and even live rounds in recent clashes. But the ordinance was widely flouted by protesters incensed that police are still allowed to cover their faces. "(It's a) serious restriction on freedom of expression and effectively criminalises a whole range of perfectly lawful acts which will now be punishable as contempt of court," he wrote on Twitter.Hong Kong has been riven by seething protests for the past 20 weeks, with violence spiralling on both sides of the ideological divide.Police did not respond to requests for clarification

Researchers lacked specific data on how people thought about the nicotine risk of specific tobacco products.Men, for example, might be less aware of the risks than women because they’re less likely to take kids to checkups and hear about the dangers first-hand from a pediatrician, Raghuveer, who wasn’t involved in the study, said by email.China Silicone Rubber O-Rings Nicotine poisonings due to children ingesting e-cigarette liquid are becoming more frequent.Compared to adults with a college degree, people with only a high school diploma were more than twice as likely to say nicotine was not harmful to kids, researchers report in Pediatrics.Another drawback is that the study lacks data on what’s behind people’s beliefs about nicotine, so it’s unclear how much some individuals might say it’s not dangerous for kids out of denial versus out of a genuine lack of understanding of the risks, said Dr.Compared to white adults.

Hispanic and African-American survey participants were much less likely to believe nicotine was definitely harmful.“Proximity to nicotine products combined with adults underestimating risk of exposure could lead to higher risk of adverse events due to children’s exposure to nicotine products,” Andrews added.

One limitation of the study is that the survey focused only on the general question of whether nicotine might be harmful for children under 13 years old, the authors note.In the study, women were 60 percent more likely than men to recognize that nicotine was “definitely harmful” to kids. Geetha Raghuveer, a cardiologist at Children’s Mercy Hospital and professor at the University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine.“While dangers of cigarette smoking to those who smoke are well publicized, those of second hand smoke or accidental ingestion of tobacco products are less well known generally,” Raghuveer said. Annie Lintzenich Andrews of the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston.Overall, 83 percent of adults understand that nicotine is “definitely harmful” to children, the analysis of national survey data from almost 12,000 US adults found.But adults who used multiple tobacco products were 60 percent more likely than nonsmokers to say nicotine was “not harmful” for children.Race was also associated with how adults thought about the risks of nicotine exposure for kids. “Nicotine users would be an ideal target population for future public health interventions to reduce children’s exposure to nicotine. (Photo: File) While most adults know nicotine is bad for children, smokers and some other individuals aren’t convinced of this fact, according to a US study that suggests a need for more public education about the risks of tobacco. And when people didn’t finish high school, they were three times more likely to think nicotine wasn’t dangerous, compared to college graduates. In the study, approximately one-third of tobacco users had at least one young child at home.”.Nicotine exposure can cause upset stomach, nausea, vomiting, changes in heart rate and blood pressure, breathing problems, and seizures in kids and can be fatal at high doses, Kemp noted.

Many parents are also unaware of the particular risks posed by liquid nicotine used in e-cigarettes, said Dr.Most often, kids are exposed to nicotine from a parent or another person who lives in their home, Kemp said. Chronic exposure can lead to heart problems, asthma, developmental and behavioral disorders, an increased risk of addiction to other drugs.“It is important that all adults, not just parents of young children or tobacco product users, understand that nicotine is very harmful to children,” said lead study author Catherine Kemp, a public health researcher at Georgia State University in Atlanta.“Nicotine poisonings due to children ingesting e-cigarette liquid are becoming more frequent,” Andrews, who wasn’t involved in the study, said by email. Men, meanwhile, were 40 percent more likely than women to think nicotine wasn’t harmful or say they weren’t sure about the risks. Nicotine poisonings due to children ingesting e-cigarette liquid are becoming more frequent.Less educated adults, meanwhile, might really be less aware of the risks,” Raghuveer added.“There is no established safe level of nicotine exposure for children,” Kemp said by email

Vietnam may give internet companies one year to comply with a controversial cybersecurity law. The cybersecurity bill, which observers say mimic China's repressive web control tools, is set to come into effect in January despite drawing sharp criticism from the US, the EU and internet freedom advocates.With 53 million users, Facebook is by far the leading site in Vietnam, a country of 93 million. This week, the government said it had set up a web monitoring unit that can scan up to 100 million items per day to sniff out "false information". The cybersecurity bill, which observers say mimic China&Automobile Tubing Suppliers39;s repressive web control tools, is set to come into # effect in January despite drawing sharp criticism from the US, the EU and internet freedom advocates. It is a crucial platform for activists -- and many have been jailed based on Facebook posts -- but also a leading site for business owners.Google declined to comment Saturday, while Facebook did not immediately respond to a request from AFP.

It did not outline the punishment for failing to comply, but any country in breach of the law could be barred from offering its services in Vietnam.The bill would require tech companies to store data in the country, and remove "toxic content" from websites and hand over user information if asked by the government to do so.According to a draft decree on how the law may be implemented, published by the Ministry of Public Security Friday, companies offering internet services in Vietnam may be given 12 months to comply. "Enterprises. The public has two months to provide feedback on the decree, in line with Vietnamese law, though public comments have not traditionally led to dramatic alterations to proposed bills.

Any efforts to block access to the site are likely to spark widespread opposition across the country.The law was passed by Vietnam's rubber-stamp parliament in June, part of a broader crackdown on internet freedoms that has sparked outcry from the country's activists. Critics of the bill say it will be a chokehold on criticism in the one-party state where activists are routinely jailed and all independent media are banned. Personal data required to be stored includes everything from a user's name to passport number, medical records, credit card information and biometric data.

Vietnam may give internet companies like Google and Facebook one year to comply with a controversial cybersecurity law, according to a draft decree that outlines how the draconian bill could be implemented. must archive data (and) set up branches or representative offices in Vietnam," the decree said. A few days later officials said 3,000 sites featuring "inappropriate content" had been blocked. An enterprise can mean internet service providers, e-commerce sites, online payment firms and social networks.The draft decree added that companies must store user data in the country for at least 36 months.